Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] improving storage testing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 15/02/2019 03:52, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi, Bart
> 
> In this way, we may end up modifying probably most of the common tools,
> which in long run can create a bunch of the code for the tests. If everyone
> (test contributors and tools maintainers) agrees to have such a "test" mode
> to all the tools, we can go for this approach.

I think going the path similar to xfstests and adding filter functions
to normalize the output in blktests is way less of a hassle than
changing every possible tool we might want to use to have a "test" mode.

Just my two cents,
	Johannes
-- 
Johannes Thumshirn                            SUSE Labs Filesystems
jthumshirn@xxxxxxx                                +49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux