Re: [PATCH 05/18] Add io_uring IO interface

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/1/19 11:20 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Jens Axboe:
> 
>> +/*
>> + * Filled with the offset for mmap(2)
>> + */
>> +struct io_sqring_offsets {
>> +	__u32 head;
>> +	__u32 tail;
>> +	__u32 ring_mask;
>> +	__u32 ring_entries;
>> +	__u32 flags;
>> +	__u32 dropped;
>> +	__u32 array;
>> +	__u32 resv[3];
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct io_cqring_offsets {
>> +	__u32 head;
>> +	__u32 tail;
>> +	__u32 ring_mask;
>> +	__u32 ring_entries;
>> +	__u32 overflow;
>> +	__u32 cqes;
>> +	__u32 resv[4];
>> +};
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * io_uring_enter(2) flags
>> + */
>> +#define IORING_ENTER_GETEVENTS	(1U << 0)
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Passed in for io_uring_setup(2). Copied back with updated info on success
>> + */
>> +struct io_uring_params {
>> +	__u32 sq_entries;
>> +	__u32 cq_entries;
>> +	__u32 flags;
>> +	__u32 resv[7];
>> +	struct io_sqring_offsets sq_off;
>> +	struct io_cqring_offsets cq_off;
>> +};
> 
> I still think it might be a good idea to have one reserved __u64 field
> for alignment purposes.

Sure, I can do that.

-- 
Jens Axboe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux