On Mon, 4 Feb 2019, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 09:50:08PM +0100, David Kozub wrote:
This should make no change in functionality.
The formatting changes were triggered by checkpatch.pl.
Signed-off-by: David Kozub <zub@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Scott Bauer <sbauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
block/sed-opal.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/sed-opal.c b/block/sed-opal.c
index e0de4dd448b3..c882a193e162 100644
--- a/block/sed-opal.c
+++ b/block/sed-opal.c
@@ -11,8 +11,8 @@
*
* This program is distributed in the hope it will be useful, but WITHOUT
* ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
- * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for
- * more details.
+ * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License
+ * for more details.
What exactly is the fix here?
If we want to fix the licence boilerplate we should switch it to an
SPDX tag instead.
Otherwise this looks fine to me.
I thought checkpatch.pl -f block/sed-opal.c complained about the line
being too long. But when I try that again now (with the original version),
it does not complain. So I probably saw a ghost.
I'll undo this change.
