在 2019/1/18 下午1:18, Daniel Axtens 写道:
> Some users see panics like the following when performing fstrim on a bcached volume:
>
> [ 529.803060] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000008
> [ 530.183928] #PF error: [normal kernel read fault]
> [ 530.412392] PGD 8000001f42163067 P4D 8000001f42163067 PUD 1f42168067 PMD 0
> [ 530.750887] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
> [ 530.920869] CPU: 10 PID: 4167 Comm: fstrim Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.0.0-rc1+ #3
> [ 531.290204] Hardware name: HP ProLiant DL360 Gen9/ProLiant DL360 Gen9, BIOS P89 12/27/2015
> [ 531.693137] RIP: 0010:blk_queue_split+0x148/0x620
> [ 531.922205] Code: 60 38 89 55 a0 45 31 db 45 31 f6 45 31 c9 31 ff 89 4d 98 85 db 0f 84 7f 04 00 00 44 8b 6d 98 4c 89 ee 48 c1 e6 04 49 03 70 78 <8b> 46 08 44 8b 56 0c 48
> 8b 16 44 29 e0 39 d8 48 89 55 a8 0f 47 c3
> [ 532.838634] RSP: 0018:ffffb9b708df39b0 EFLAGS: 00010246
> [ 533.093571] RAX: 00000000ffffffff RBX: 0000000000046000 RCX: 0000000000000000
> [ 533.441865] RDX: 0000000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
> [ 533.789922] RBP: ffffb9b708df3a48 R08: ffff940d3b3fdd20 R09: 0000000000000000
> [ 534.137512] R10: ffffb9b708df3958 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
> [ 534.485329] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff940d39212020
> [ 534.833319] FS: 00007efec26e3840(0000) GS:ffff940d1f480000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> [ 535.224098] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> [ 535.504318] CR2: 0000000000000008 CR3: 0000001f4e256004 CR4: 00000000001606e0
> [ 535.851759] Call Trace:
> [ 535.970308] ? mempool_alloc_slab+0x15/0x20
> [ 536.174152] ? bch_data_insert+0x42/0xd0 [bcache]
> [ 536.403399] blk_mq_make_request+0x97/0x4f0
> [ 536.607036] generic_make_request+0x1e2/0x410
> [ 536.819164] submit_bio+0x73/0x150
> [ 536.980168] ? submit_bio+0x73/0x150
> [ 537.149731] ? bio_associate_blkg_from_css+0x3b/0x60
> [ 537.391595] ? _cond_resched+0x1a/0x50
> [ 537.573774] submit_bio_wait+0x59/0x90
> [ 537.756105] blkdev_issue_discard+0x80/0xd0
> [ 537.959590] ext4_trim_fs+0x4a9/0x9e0
> [ 538.137636] ? ext4_trim_fs+0x4a9/0x9e0
> [ 538.324087] ext4_ioctl+0xea4/0x1530
> [ 538.497712] ? _copy_to_user+0x2a/0x40
> [ 538.679632] do_vfs_ioctl+0xa6/0x600
> [ 538.853127] ? __do_sys_newfstat+0x44/0x70
> [ 539.051951] ksys_ioctl+0x6d/0x80
> [ 539.212785] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x1a/0x20
> [ 539.394918] do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x110
> [ 539.568674] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
>
> We have observed it where both:
> 1) LVM/devmapper is involved (bcache backing device is LVM volume) and
> 2) writeback cache is involved (bcache cache_mode is writeback)
>
> On one machine, we can reliably reproduce it with:
>
> # echo writeback > /sys/block/bcache0/bcache/cache_mode # not sure if this is required
> # mount /dev/bcache0 /test
> # for i in {0..10}; do file="$(mktemp /test/zero.XXX)"; dd if=/dev/zero of="$file" bs=1M count=256; sync; rm $file; done; fstrim -v /test
>
> Observing this with tracepoints on, we see the following writes:
>
> fstrim-18019 [022] .... 91107.302026: bcache_write: 73f95583-561c-408f-a93a-4cbd2498f5c8 inode 0 DS 4260112 + 196352 hit 0 bypass 1
> fstrim-18019 [022] .... 91107.302050: bcache_write: 73f95583-561c-408f-a93a-4cbd2498f5c8 inode 0 DS 4456464 + 262144 hit 0 bypass 1
> fstrim-18019 [022] .... 91107.302075: bcache_write: 73f95583-561c-408f-a93a-4cbd2498f5c8 inode 0 DS 4718608 + 81920 hit 0 bypass 1
> fstrim-18019 [022] .... 91107.302094: bcache_write: 73f95583-561c-408f-a93a-4cbd2498f5c8 inode 0 DS 5324816 + 180224 hit 0 bypass 1
> fstrim-18019 [022] .... 91107.302121: bcache_write: 73f95583-561c-408f-a93a-4cbd2498f5c8 inode 0 DS 5505040 + 262144 hit 0 bypass 1
> fstrim-18019 [022] .... 91107.302145: bcache_write: 73f95583-561c-408f-a93a-4cbd2498f5c8 inode 0 DS 5767184 + 81920 hit 0 bypass 1
> fstrim-18019 [022] .... 91107.308777: bcache_write: 73f95583-561c-408f-a93a-4cbd2498f5c8 inode 0 DS 6373392 + 180224 hit 1 bypass 0
> <crash>
>
> Note the final one has different hit/bypass flags.
>
> This is because in should_writeback(), we were hitting a case where
> the partial stripe condition was returning true and so
> should_writeback() was returning true early.
>
> If that hadn't been the case, it would have hit the would_skip test, and
> as would_skip == s->iop.bypass == true, should_writeback() would have
> returned false.
>
> Looking at the git history from 72c270612bd3 ("bcache: Write out full
> stripes"), it looks like the idea was to optimise for raid5/6:
>
> * If a stripe is already dirty, force writes to that stripe to
> writeback mode - to help build up full stripes of dirty data
>
> To fix this issue, make sure that should_writeback() on a discard op
> never returns true.
>
> More details of debugging: https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-bcache/msg06996.html
>
> Previous reports:
> - https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201051
> - https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196103
> - https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-bcache/msg06885.html
>
> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fixes: 72c270612bd3 ("bcache: Write out full stripes")
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/md/bcache/writeback.h | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.h b/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.h
> index 6a743d3bb338..4e4c6810dc3c 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.h
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.h
> @@ -71,6 +71,9 @@ static inline bool should_writeback(struct cached_dev *dc, struct bio *bio,
> in_use > bch_cutoff_writeback_sync)
> return false;
>
> + if (bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_DISCARD)
> + return false;
> +
> if (dc->partial_stripes_expensive &&
> bcache_dev_stripe_dirty(dc, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector,
> bio_sectors(bio)))
>
Hi Daniel,
Nice catch! I add this one to my for-next directory, for v5.1 merge window.
Thanks.
--
Coly Li
