Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] implement nvmf read/write queue maps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/12/18 6:58 PM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:

Sagi,

What other wins are there for this split ?

I'm considering whether its worthwhile for fc as well, but the hol issue doesn't exist with fc. What else is being resolved ?

I've pondered it myself, which is why I didn't add it to fc as well
(would have been easy enough I think). I guess that with this the
user can limit writes compared to read by assigning less queues as
jens suggested in his patches...
>
Weelll ... isn't that what blkcg is for?
I do understand if one would want to implement something like this if there's a real benefit from the _hardware_ side, but if there isn't we should try to keep it in the upper layers where it belongs.

Cheers,

Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		   Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare@xxxxxxx			               +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux