On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 11:16:31PM -0800, Sagi Grimberg wrote: > >>> Add an additional queue mapping for polling queues that will >>> host polling for latency critical I/O. >>> >>> One caveat is that we don't want these queues to be pure polling >>> as we don't want to bother with polling for the initial nvmf connect >>> I/O. Hence, introduce ib_change_cq_ctx that will modify the cq polling >>> context from SOFTIRQ to DIRECT. >> >> So do we really care? Yes, polling for the initial connect is not >> exactly efficient, but then again it doesn't happen all that often. >> >> Except for efficiency is there any problem with just starting out >> in polling mode? > > I found it cumbersome so I didn't really consider it... > Isn't it a bit awkward? we will need to implement polled connect > locally in nvme-rdma (because fabrics doesn't know anything about > queues, hctx or polling). Well, it should just be a little blk_poll loop, right? > I'm open to looking at it if you think that this is better. Note that if > we had the CQ in our hands, we would do exactly what we did here > effectively: use interrupt for the connect and then simply not > re-arm it again and poll... Should we poll the connect just because > we are behind the CQ API? I'm just worried that the switch between the different context looks like a way to easy way to shoot yourself in the foot, so if we can avoid exposing that it would make for a harder to abuse API.
