On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 06:36:21PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 12/11/18 6:23 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On 12/11/18 6:05 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >> On 12/11/18 5:38 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 8:28 AM Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Dec 11 2018 at 7:19pm -0500,
> >>>> Ming Lei <tom.leiming@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 8:04 AM Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 12/11/18 3:58 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> >>>>>>> Hi Jens,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> If I run the following subset of blktests:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> while :; do ./check -q srp && ./check -q nvmeof-mp; done
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> against today's for-next branch (commit dd2bf2df85a7) then after some
> >>>>>>> time the following hang is reported:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> INFO: task fio:14869 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
> >>>>>>> Not tainted 4.20.0-rc6-dbg+ #1
> >>>>>>> "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> >>>>>>> fio D25272 14869 14195 0x00000000
> >>>>>>> Call Trace:
> >>>>>>> __schedule+0x401/0xe50
> >>>>>>> schedule+0x4e/0xd0
> >>>>>>> io_schedule+0x21/0x50
> >>>>>>> blk_mq_get_tag+0x46d/0x640
> >>>>>>> blk_mq_get_request+0x7c0/0xa00
> >>>>>>> blk_mq_make_request+0x241/0xa70
> >>>>>>> generic_make_request+0x411/0x950
> >>>>>>> submit_bio+0x9b/0x250
> >>>>>>> blkdev_direct_IO+0x7fb/0x870
> >>>>>>> generic_file_direct_write+0x119/0x210
> >>>>>>> __generic_file_write_iter+0x11c/0x280
> >>>>>>> blkdev_write_iter+0x13c/0x220
> >>>>>>> aio_write+0x204/0x310
> >>>>>>> io_submit_one+0x9c6/0xe70
> >>>>>>> __x64_sys_io_submit+0x115/0x340
> >>>>>>> do_syscall_64+0x71/0x210
> >>>>>>> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> When that hang occurs my list-pending-block-requests script does not show
> >>>>>>> any pending requests:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> # list-pending-block-requests
> >>>>>>> dm-0
> >>>>>>> loop0
> >>>>>>> loop1
> >>>>>>> loop2
> >>>>>>> loop3
> >>>>>>> loop4
> >>>>>>> loop5
> >>>>>>> loop6
> >>>>>>> loop7
> >>>>>>> nullb0
> >>>>>>> nullb1
> >>>>>>> sda
> >>>>>>> sdb
> >>>>>>> sdc
> >>>>>>> sdd
> >>>>>>> vda
> >>>>>>> vdb
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Enabling fail_if_no_path mode did not resolve the hang so I don't think
> >>>>>>> that the root cause is in any of the dm drivers used in this test:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> # dmsetup ls | while read dm rest; do dmsetup message $dm 0 fail_if_no_path; done; dmsetup remove_all; dmsetup table
> >>>>>>> 360014056e756c6c62300000000000000: 0 65536 multipath 0 1 alua 1 1 service-time 0 1 2 8:16 1 1
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The same test passes against kernel v4.20-rc6.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> What device is this being run on?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I saw this issue on usb storage too.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Seems it is introduced by commit ea86ea2cdced ("sbitmap: ammortize cost of
> >>>>> clearing bits"). When the IO hang happens, .cleared is 2, and .busy is 0 on
> >>>>> the sched_tag's sbitmap queue.
> >>>>
> >>>> You saw this running the same tests as Bart?
> >>>
> >>> Not the srp test as done by Bart, I just run 'parted' test on usb storage disk,
> >>> see the attached test script.
> >>>
> >>> Mostly it can be triggered in one run, sometimes it needs more.
> >>
> >> I'll take a look. The ->cleared doesn't make sense for QD=1, or on
> >> one word in general. But I'd like to try and understand why it hangs.
> >>
> >> Are you using a scheduler?
> >
> > OK, I think I see what it is, the shallow is missing the deferred clear.
> > On top of this, probably worth to check at what depths deferred starts
> > to make sense. For QD == 1, definitely not. But that should be on top of
> > the fix.
> >
> > Can you try this one?
>
> This one should be complete. The former should fix the case, this one
> just adds the last two cases where we ignored ->cleared. For some of
> them we'll never hit it since deferred isn't used for that, but I
> think we're better off with full coverage.
>
>
> diff --git a/lib/sbitmap.c b/lib/sbitmap.c
> index 2261136ae067..5b3e56d68dab 100644
> --- a/lib/sbitmap.c
> +++ b/lib/sbitmap.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,47 @@
> #include <linux/sbitmap.h>
> #include <linux/seq_file.h>
>
> +/*
> + * See if we have deferred clears that we can batch move
> + */
> +static inline bool sbitmap_deferred_clear(struct sbitmap *sb, int index)
> +{
> + unsigned long mask, val;
> + unsigned long __maybe_unused flags;
> + bool ret = false;
> +
> + /* Silence bogus lockdep warning */
> +#if defined(CONFIG_LOCKDEP)
> + local_irq_save(flags);
> +#endif
> + spin_lock(&sb->map[index].swap_lock);
> +
> + if (!sb->map[index].cleared)
> + goto out_unlock;
> +
> + /*
> + * First get a stable cleared mask, setting the old mask to 0.
> + */
> + do {
> + mask = sb->map[index].cleared;
> + } while (cmpxchg(&sb->map[index].cleared, mask, 0) != mask);
> +
> + /*
> + * Now clear the masked bits in our free word
> + */
> + do {
> + val = sb->map[index].word;
> + } while (cmpxchg(&sb->map[index].word, val, val & ~mask) != val);
> +
> + ret = true;
> +out_unlock:
> + spin_unlock(&sb->map[index].swap_lock);
> +#if defined(CONFIG_LOCKDEP)
> + local_irq_restore(flags);
> +#endif
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> int sbitmap_init_node(struct sbitmap *sb, unsigned int depth, int shift,
> gfp_t flags, int node)
> {
> @@ -70,6 +111,9 @@ void sbitmap_resize(struct sbitmap *sb, unsigned int depth)
> unsigned int bits_per_word = 1U << sb->shift;
> unsigned int i;
>
> + for (i = 0; i < sb->map_nr; i++)
> + sbitmap_deferred_clear(sb, i);
> +
> sb->depth = depth;
> sb->map_nr = DIV_ROUND_UP(sb->depth, bits_per_word);
>
> @@ -112,47 +156,6 @@ static int __sbitmap_get_word(unsigned long *word, unsigned long depth,
> return nr;
> }
>
> -/*
> - * See if we have deferred clears that we can batch move
> - */
> -static inline bool sbitmap_deferred_clear(struct sbitmap *sb, int index)
> -{
> - unsigned long mask, val;
> - unsigned long __maybe_unused flags;
> - bool ret = false;
> -
> - /* Silence bogus lockdep warning */
> -#if defined(CONFIG_LOCKDEP)
> - local_irq_save(flags);
> -#endif
> - spin_lock(&sb->map[index].swap_lock);
> -
> - if (!sb->map[index].cleared)
> - goto out_unlock;
> -
> - /*
> - * First get a stable cleared mask, setting the old mask to 0.
> - */
> - do {
> - mask = sb->map[index].cleared;
> - } while (cmpxchg(&sb->map[index].cleared, mask, 0) != mask);
> -
> - /*
> - * Now clear the masked bits in our free word
> - */
> - do {
> - val = sb->map[index].word;
> - } while (cmpxchg(&sb->map[index].word, val, val & ~mask) != val);
> -
> - ret = true;
> -out_unlock:
> - spin_unlock(&sb->map[index].swap_lock);
> -#if defined(CONFIG_LOCKDEP)
> - local_irq_restore(flags);
> -#endif
> - return ret;
> -}
> -
> static int sbitmap_find_bit_in_index(struct sbitmap *sb, int index,
> unsigned int alloc_hint, bool round_robin)
> {
> @@ -215,6 +218,7 @@ int sbitmap_get_shallow(struct sbitmap *sb, unsigned int alloc_hint,
> index = SB_NR_TO_INDEX(sb, alloc_hint);
>
> for (i = 0; i < sb->map_nr; i++) {
> +again:
> nr = __sbitmap_get_word(&sb->map[index].word,
> min(sb->map[index].depth, shallow_depth),
> SB_NR_TO_BIT(sb, alloc_hint), true);
> @@ -223,6 +227,9 @@ int sbitmap_get_shallow(struct sbitmap *sb, unsigned int alloc_hint,
> break;
> }
>
> + if (sbitmap_deferred_clear(sb, index))
> + goto again;
> +
> /* Jump to next index. */
> index++;
> alloc_hint = index << sb->shift;
> @@ -242,7 +249,7 @@ bool sbitmap_any_bit_set(const struct sbitmap *sb)
> unsigned int i;
>
> for (i = 0; i < sb->map_nr; i++) {
> - if (sb->map[i].word)
> + if (sb->map[i].word & ~sb->map[i].cleared)
> return true;
> }
> return false;
> @@ -255,9 +262,10 @@ bool sbitmap_any_bit_clear(const struct sbitmap *sb)
>
> for (i = 0; i < sb->map_nr; i++) {
> const struct sbitmap_word *word = &sb->map[i];
> + unsigned long mask = word->word & ~word->cleared;
> unsigned long ret;
>
> - ret = find_first_zero_bit(&word->word, word->depth);
> + ret = find_first_zero_bit(&mask, word->depth);
> if (ret < word->depth)
> return true;
> }
This one works too:
Tested-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks,
Ming
