On 12/9/18 1:35 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > I can't say anything about the correctness of this patch, but I no longer > see any warnings. > > Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks for testing! In terms of correctness, it does the right thing, just always makes it an IRQ lock for lockdep. See analysis above. This is better than disabling lockdep, since we'll still trigger other violations (like ordering). -- Jens Axboe
