On Thu, Dec 06 2018 at 8:04pm -0500,
jianchao.wang <jianchao.w.wang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On 12/7/18 6:20 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > After the direct dispatch corruption fix, we permanently disallow direct
> > dispatch of non read/write requests. This works fine off the normal IO
> > path, as they will be retried like any other failed direct dispatch
> > request. But for the blk_insert_cloned_request() that only DM uses to
> > bypass the bottom level scheduler, we always first attempt direct
> > dispatch. For some types of requests, that's now a permanent failure,
> > and no amount of retrying will make that succeed.
> >
> > Don't use direct dispatch off the cloned insert path, always just use
> > bypass inserts. This still bypasses the bottom level scheduler, which is
> > what DM wants.
> >
> > Fixes: ffe81d45322c ("blk-mq: fix corruption with direct issue")
> > Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> > index deb56932f8c4..4c44e6fa0d08 100644
> > --- a/block/blk-core.c
> > +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> > @@ -2637,7 +2637,8 @@ blk_status_t blk_insert_cloned_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *
> > * bypass a potential scheduler on the bottom device for
> > * insert.
> > */
> > - return blk_mq_request_issue_directly(rq);
> > + blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(rq, true);
> > + return BLK_STS_OK;
> > }
> >
> > spin_lock_irqsave(q->queue_lock, flags);
> >
> Not sure about this because it will break the merging promotion for request based DM
> from Ming.
> 396eaf21ee17c476e8f66249fb1f4a39003d0ab4
> (blk-mq: improve DM's blk-mq IO merging via blk_insert_cloned_request feedback)
Ngh.. yeah, forgot about that convoluted feedback loop.
> We could use some other way to fix this.
Yeah, afraid we have to.
