Re: for-next branch and blktests/srp

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/6/18 10:19 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-12-06 at 10:00 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 12/6/18 9:47 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>>> If I merge Jens' for-next branch with Linus' master branch, boot the
>>> resulting kernel in a VM and run blktests/tests/srp/002 then that test
>>> never finishes. The same test passes against Linus' master branch. I
>>> think this is a regression. The following appears in the system log if
>>> I run that test:
>>
>> You are running that test on a dm device? Can you shed some light on
>> how that dm device is setup?
> 
> Hi Jens,
> 
> The dm device referred to in my e-mail is a dm-mpath device created by test
> srp/002. All parameters of that device are under control of that test script.
> From the srp/002 test script:
> 
> DESCRIPTION="File I/O on top of multipath concurrently with logout and login (mq)"
> 
> From srp/multipath.conf:
> 
> defaults {
> 	find_multipaths		no
> 	user_friendly_names	yes
> 	queue_without_daemon	no
> }
> 
> devices {
> 	device {
> 		vendor		"LIO-ORG|SCST_BIO|FUSIONIO"
> 		product		".*"
> 		features	"1 queue_if_no_path"
> 		path_checker	tur
> 	}
> }

5 kernel compiles later, and I think I'm almost ready to run it...

-- 
Jens Axboe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux