On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 07:34:51PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 11/27/18 7:10 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 09:35:53AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >> We need this for blk-mq to kick things into gear, if we told it that
> >> we had more IO coming, but then failed to deliver on that promise.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> >> index 6e869d05f91e..b49c57e77780 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> >> @@ -214,6 +214,20 @@ static void virtblk_done(struct virtqueue *vq)
> >> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vblk->vqs[qid].lock, flags);
> >> }
> >>
> >> +static void virtio_commit_rqs(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
> >> +{
> >> + struct virtio_blk *vblk = hctx->queue->queuedata;
> >> + int qid = hctx->queue_num;
> >> + bool kick;
> >> +
> >> + spin_lock_irq(&vblk->vqs[qid].lock);
> >> + kick = virtqueue_kick_prepare(vblk->vqs[qid].vq);
> >> + spin_unlock_irq(&vblk->vqs[qid].lock);
> >> +
> >> + if (kick)
> >> + virtqueue_notify(vblk->vqs[qid].vq);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> static blk_status_t virtio_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> >> const struct blk_mq_queue_data *bd)
> >> {
> >> @@ -638,6 +652,7 @@ static void virtblk_initialize_rq(struct request *req)
> >>
> >> static const struct blk_mq_ops virtio_mq_ops = {
> >> .queue_rq = virtio_queue_rq,
> >> + .commit_rqs = virtio_commit_rqs,
> >> .complete = virtblk_request_done,
> >> .init_request = virtblk_init_request,
> >> #ifdef CONFIG_VIRTIO_BLK_SCSI
> >> --
> >> 2.17.1
> >>
> >
> > If .commit_rqs() is implemented, virtqueue_notify() in virtio_queue_rq()
> > should have been removed for saving the world switch per .queue_rq()
>
> ->commits_rqs() is only for the case where bd->last is set to false,
> and we never make it to the end and flag bd->last == true. If bd->last
> is true, the driver should kick things into gear.
OK, looks I misunderstood it. However, virtio-blk doesn't need this
change since virtio_queue_rq() can handle it well. This patch may introduce
one unnecessary VM world switch in case of queue busy.
IMO bd->last won't work well in case of io scheduler given the rq_list
only includes one single request.
I wrote this kind of patch(never posted) before to use sort of ->commits_rqs()
to replace the current bd->last mechanism which need one extra driver tag,
which may improve the above case, also code gets cleaned up.
Thanks,
Ming
