On 11/27/2018 9:48 AM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
This looks odd. It's not really the timeout handlers job to
call nvme_end_request here.
Well.. if we are not yet LIVE, we will not trigger error
recovery, which means nothing will complete this command so
something needs to do it...
I think that we need it for rdma too..
yes we do. and we've patches in our pipe.
I'm thinking on a wider change in the error/recovery flows but might
send it "as is" meanwhile.
I have it too in the pipe. Do you want to send it out or should I?
go for it. We've several patches that are under testing and review
currently.
