On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 10:26:38AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 06:05:21AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 07:23:10PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > @@ -456,7 +456,7 @@ struct request_queue {
> > > /*
> > > * mq queue kobject
> > > */
> > > - struct kobject mq_kobj;
> > > + struct kobject *mq_kobj;
> >
> > What is this kobject even used for? It wasn't obvious at all from this
> > patch, why is it needed if you are not using it to reference count the
> > larger structure here?
>
> All attributes and kobjects under /sys/block/$DEV/mq are covered by this kobject
> actually, and all are for exposing blk-mq specific information, but now there is
> only blk-mq, and legacy io path is removed.
I am sorry, but I really can not parse this sentance at all.
What Documentation/ABI/ entries are covered by this kobject, that should
help me out more. And what do you mean by "legacy io"?
> That is why I mentioned we may remove this kobject last time and move all under
> /sys/block/$DEV/queue, however you thought that may break some userspace.
Who relies on these sysfs files today?
> If we want to backport them to stable, this patch may be a bit easier to go.
Why do you want to backport any of this to stable?
thanks,
greg k-h
