On 11/17/2018 10:15 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 09:16:22 -0800
+static unsigned nvmet_tcp_recv_budget = 8;
+module_param_named(recv_budget, nvmet_tcp_recv_budget, int, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(recv_budget, "recvs budget");
+
+static unsigned nvmet_tcp_send_budget = 8;
+module_param_named(send_budget, nvmet_tcp_send_budget, int, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(send_budget, "sends budget");
+
+static unsigned nvmet_tcp_io_work_budget = 64;
+module_param_named(io_work_budget, nvmet_tcp_io_work_budget, int, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(io_work_budget, "io work budget");
I strongly suggest moving away from module parameters for this stuff.
agree here.
also, Sagi, can you explain about the performance trade-offs seen during
your development for these values ?
are they HCA/NIC dependent ?
should send/recv ratio be 1:1 ?
should total/send/recv ratio be 8:1:1 ?
Create a genetlink socket family and allow run time configuration of these knobs
by the user.
Thanks.
