On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 08:41:25AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 08:22:26AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 12:02:36PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 08:48:48AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 05:44:07PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 05:20:51PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > > > > On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 12:35:18PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Images with CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT=y, CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE=y
> > > > > > > enabled report kobject lifetime issues when booting an image in qemu
> > > > > > > using virtio-scsi-pci.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Bisect points to two different commits, depending on the kernel
> > > > > > > configuration.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 1st configuration: defconfig plus:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > CONFIG_VIRTIO_BLK=y
> > > > > > > CONFIG_SCSI_LOWLEVEL=y
> > > > > > > CONFIG_SCSI_VIRTIO=y
> > > > > > > CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI=y
> > > > > > > CONFIG_VIRTIO_MMIO=y
> > > > > > > CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS=y
> > > > > > > CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_FREE=y
> > > > > > > CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_TIMERS=y
> > > > > > > CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT=y
> > > > > > > CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE=y
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Bisecting this configuration points to commit b5b6e8c8d3b4 ("scsi:
> > > > > > > virtio_scsi: fix IO hang caused by automatic irq vector affinity")
> > > > > > > as the culprit. This commit enforces the use of blk-mq for virtio_scsi;
> > > > > > > the bisect log is therefore a bit misleading.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2nd configuration: As above, plus:
> > > > > > > CONFIG_SCSI_MQ_DEFAULT=y
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > With this configuration, bisect points to commit 7ea5fe31c12d
> > > > > > > ("blk-mq: make lifetime consitent between q/ctx and its kobject").
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The qemu command line used to reproduce the problem is as follows.
> > > > > > > The qemu version does not seem to matter (I tested with qemu versions
> > > > > > > 2.5, 2.11, and 3.0).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > qemu-system-x86_64 \
> > > > > > > -kernel arch/x86/boot/bzImage \
> > > > > > > -device virtio-scsi-pci,id=scsi \
> > > > > > > -device scsi-hd,bus=scsi.0,drive=d0 \
> > > > > > > -drive file=./wheezy.img,format=raw,if=none,id=d0 \
> > > > > > > -snapshot \
> > > > > > > -m 2G -smp 4 -enable-kvm \
> > > > > > > -net user,host=10.0.2.10,hostfwd=tcp::10022-:22 -net nic \
> > > > > > > -nographic -monitor none \
> > > > > > > -no-reboot \
> > > > > > > -append "console=ttyS0 root=/dev/sda earlyprintk=serial panic_on_warn=1 panic=-1"
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Root file system:
> > > > > > > https://storage.googleapis.com/syzkaller/wheezy.img
> > > > > > > or:
> > > > > > > https://github.com/groeck/linux-build-test/blob/master/rootfs/x86_64/rootfs.ext2.gz
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It seems that any root file system can be used to reproduce the problem.
> > > > > > > Also, the problem is not limited to virtio-scsi-pci. I also tried
> > > > > > > am53c974, lsi53c810, and lsi53c895a (after enabling the respective
> > > > > > > drivers), with the same result.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Overall, this suggests that the problem is related to blk-mq and was
> > > > > > > indeed introduced with commit 7ea5fe31c12d.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > For reference, I attached an actual crash log as well as a set of bisect
> > > > > > > logs below.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Unfortunately, my understanding of blk-mq is not good enough to find the
> > > > > > > underlying problem and suggest a fix. Please let me know if there is
> > > > > > > anything else I can do to help fixing the problem.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Note that the problem was originally reported by syzbot running a test
> > > > > > > on chromeos-4.14. It may well be that the problem has already been
> > > > > > > reported and is being worked on. If so, please apologize the noise.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Guenter
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > [ 8.700038] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > > > > > [ 8.700376] ODEBUG: free active (active state 0) object type: timer_list hint: delayed_work_timer_fn+0x0/0x10
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at lib/debugobjects.c:329 debug_print_object+0x6a/0x80
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] Kernel panic - not syncing: panic_on_warn set ...
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.20.0-rc1 #30
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Ubuntu-1.8.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] Call Trace:
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] <IRQ>
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] dump_stack+0x46/0x5b
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] panic+0xf3/0x246
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] ? debug_print_object+0x6a/0x80
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] __warn+0xeb/0xf0
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] ? debug_print_object+0x6a/0x80
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] ? debug_print_object+0x6a/0x80
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] report_bug+0xb1/0x120
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] fixup_bug.part.10+0x13/0x30
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] do_error_trap+0x8f/0xb0
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] do_invalid_op+0x31/0x40
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] ? debug_print_object+0x6a/0x80
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] invalid_op+0x14/0x20
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] RIP: 0010:debug_print_object+0x6a/0x80
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] Code: 8b 43 10 83 c2 01 8b 4b 14 89 15 c1 e2 78 01 4c 8b 45 00 4c
> > > > > > > 89 e6 48 c7 c7 f0 ca 41 a6 48 8b 14 c5 a0 f7 24 a6 e8 06 8e cc ff <0f> 0b 5b 83
> > > > > > > 05 70 47 1a 01 01 5d 41 5c c3 83 05 65 47 1a 01 01 c3
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] RSP: 0018:ffff89b9fda03e48 EFLAGS: 00010082
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff89b9fd49d0c8 RCX: ffffffffa6646e18
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000082 RDI: ffffffffa6cc596c
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] RBP: ffffffffa664a5c0 R08: 79616c6564203a74 R09: 5f6b726f775f6465
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] R10: ffff89b9fda03f10 R11: 3178302f3078302b R12: ffffffffa6403e22
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffffffffa6d4d458 R15: ffff89b9fc4c8780
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] ? debug_print_object+0x6a/0x80
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] debug_check_no_obj_freed+0x1b8/0x1ea
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] ? rcu_process_callbacks+0x2a7/0x750
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] kmem_cache_free+0x6e/0x1a0
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] ? __blk_release_queue+0x150/0x150
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] rcu_process_callbacks+0x2a7/0x750
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] __do_softirq+0xf2/0x2c7
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] irq_exit+0xb7/0xc0
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x67/0x130
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] apic_timer_interrupt+0xf/0x20
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] </IRQ>
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] RIP: 0010:default_idle+0x12/0x140
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] Code: fe ff ff c6 43 08 00 fb eb b0 31 c0 eb b4 e8 65 c8 60 ff 90
> > > > > > > 90 90 90 90 41 54 55 53 65 8b 2d 15 c4 3b 5a 66 66 66 66 90 fb f4 <65> 8b 2d 07
> > > > > > > c4 3b 5a 66 66 66 66 90 5b 5d 41 5c c3 65 8b 05 f6 c3
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] RSP: 0018:ffffffffa6603e98 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffff13
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] RAX: ffffffffa5c52d10 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 000000020605092a
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffffffffcff7766a R09: ffff89b9fda20b00
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000002400 R12: ffffffffa6611740
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffffffffa6611740
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] ? __sched_text_end+0x5/0x5
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] do_idle+0x19c/0x230
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] cpu_startup_entry+0x14/0x20
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] start_kernel+0x491/0x4b1
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0
> > > > > > > [ 8.701032] Kernel Offset: 0x24200000 from 0xffffffff81000000 (relocation range: 0xffffffff80000000-0xffffffffbfffffff)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > That is simply caused by enabling DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE itself, which
> > > > > > tries to do kboject_release() after delaying a while.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Wrt. this issue, q->mq_kobj is embedded in 'request_queue' whose
> > > > > > instance is freed in release handler of q->kobj. So when one instance
> > > > > > of 'request_queue' is freed, DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE still expects that
> > > > > > the q->mq_kobj is active.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The release handler of q->mq_kobj is NOP actually, so in reality it won't
> > > > > > be one issue at all.
> > > > >
> > > > > Given we have removed legacy IO path completely, it should be fine to
> > > > > remove q->mq_kobj and simply put everything under the kobj of queue,
> > > > > especially any attributes under mq aren't marked as stable ABI.
> > > >
> > > > That might be possible going forward, but that does not appear to be
> > > > a feasible solution for stable releases. I am not sure though if the
> > > > "stable ABI" argument is valid. Almost all sysfs attributes are not
> > > > marked stable. If there are applications using it, removing the atttributes
> > > > would still break userspace.
> > >
> > > Yeah, don't move attributes around for no good reason, you will make
> > > userspace grumpy :)
> >
> > There are very less attributes left under /sys/block/$DEV/mq.
> >
> > >
> > > > Since the release function of mq_kobj is NOP (for reference, I assume
> > > > we are talking about blk_mq_sysfs_release), can it just be NULL ?
> > >
> > > Someone tried to work around the internal kernel warning that comes
> > > about when you set a release function to NULL. As per the in-kernel
> > > documentation, I now get to make fun of that author by saying "do you
> > > think I added those checks and message just for no good reason? Don't
> > > try to be smarter than the driver core by providing an empty release
> > > function to make the kernel be quiet. That's NOT what the kernel is
> > > trying to tell you here at all."
> > >
> > > So fix this, that is the correct thing to do. Memory is freed in a
> > > release function, to not do so is almost always a sign of a design bug.
> >
> > The root cause is that both q->kobj and q->mq_kobj are bound to lifetime
> > of same 'request_queue' instance.
Then that is the problem right there. You can not have two reference
counted objects that somehow "share" the refrence counted logic like
this. You can not "bind" them together except if you properly handle
the references on all objects.
Hopefully you do not actually have more than one kobject in the same
structure? You can have pointers, but not a real structure.
If you have a pointer, great, treat it as an individual object like you
should and handle things correctly that way by properly incrementing and
decrementing it as needed. But do not think that somehow you are
controlling them at the same time as other parts of the kernel (and
userspace) can grab references and hold things for longer than you are
expecting.
That is why you can not have an empty release function, to do so means
you have a design bug with how you have used these structures.
So please go fix this, if you just have pointers to kobjects, there
should not be any issues. If you do not, then you have problems. Do
you have any specific code I should look at here to try to figure out
what you all are doing (note I'm at a conference all week so my response
time is slow...)
> > We may allocate q->mq_kobj dynamically to fix this issue.
> >
> > And now all drivers are converted to mq, and it is really necessary to keep
> > 'q->mq_kobj'
> >
> > >
> > > > That it is an empty function seems to be just as good or bad as having
> > > > no function at all. An empty function just avoids the "broken" debug
> > > > message. That message is still better than rendering DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE
> > > > useless.
> > > >
> > > > Copying GregKH for input.
> > >
> > > Thanks, this code is broken and needs to be fixed.
> >
> > I will post a patch to address the 'issue'.
>
> Not only q->mq_kobj, there is also each 'struct blk_mq_ctx' which is
> referenced via percpu variable of q->queue_ctx, we still may introduce
> one indirect table and allocate each blk_mq_ctx dynamically just for
> making DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE happy. But code can become not readable
> as before.
>
> Just wondering if it is possible to deal with this kind of shared
> lifetime issue among kobjects.
No, and you should not think about it as a "shared lifetime issue", all
objects have their own lifetime and if it just so happens that some of
them seem to share the same increment/decrement logic at the same time,
that's great. But again, you can not rely on that as this test proves.
> In this case, q->mq_kobj, every 'struct blk_mq_ctx' referenced via
> q->queue_ctx and q->kobj share same lifetime, it is fine to just
> release them in one release handler.
No it is not as you can see, and as I wrote above.
thanks,
greg k-h
