Jens, On Sat, 3 Nov 2018, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 11/2/18 8:59 AM, Ming Lei wrote: > > Hi Jens, > > > > As I mentioned, there are at least two issues in the patch of ' > > irq: add support for allocating (and affinitizing) sets of IRQs': > > > > 1) it is wrong to pass 'mask + usedvec' to irq_build_affinity_masks() > > > > 2) we should spread all possible CPUs in 2-stage way on each set of IRQs > > > > The fix isn't trivial, and I introduce two extra patches as preparation, > > then the implementation can be more clean. > > > > The patchset is against mq-maps branch of block tree, feel free to > > integrate into the whole patchset of multiple queue maps. > > Thanks Ming, I ran this through my testing, and I end up with the > same maps and affinities for all the cases I cared about. I'm going > to drop my initial version, and add the three. So I assume, that I can pick up Mings series instead. There is another patch pending affecting the irq affinity spreading. Can you folks please have a look at it? https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181102180248.13583-1-longli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Thanks, tglx
