Re: [PATCH] block: don't deal with discard limit in blkdev_issue_discard()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/12/18 9:53 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> blk_queue_split() does respect this limit via bio splitting, so no
> need to do that in blkdev_issue_discard(), then we can align to
> normal bio submit(bio_add_page() & submit_bio()).
> 
> More importantly, this patch fixes one issue introduced in a22c4d7e34402cc
> ("block: re-add discard_granularity and alignment checks"), in which
> zero discard bio may be generated in case of zero alignment.
> 
> Fixes: a22c4d7e34402ccdf3 ("block: re-add discard_granularity and alignment checks")
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Mariusz Dabrowski <mariusz.dabrowski@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ming Lin <ming.l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   block/blk-lib.c | 28 ++--------------------------
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-lib.c b/block/blk-lib.c
> index d1b9dd03da25..bbd44666f2b5 100644
> --- a/block/blk-lib.c
> +++ b/block/blk-lib.c
> @@ -29,9 +29,7 @@ int __blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
>   {
>   	struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
>   	struct bio *bio = *biop;
> -	unsigned int granularity;
>   	unsigned int op;
> -	int alignment;
>   	sector_t bs_mask;
>   
>   	if (!q)
> @@ -54,38 +52,16 @@ int __blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
>   	if ((sector | nr_sects) & bs_mask)
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   
> -	/* Zero-sector (unknown) and one-sector granularities are the same.  */
> -	granularity = max(q->limits.discard_granularity >> 9, 1U);
> -	alignment = (bdev_discard_alignment(bdev) >> 9) % granularity;
> -
>   	while (nr_sects) {
> -		unsigned int req_sects;
> -		sector_t end_sect, tmp;
> +		unsigned int req_sects = nr_sects;
> +		sector_t end_sect;
>   
> -		/*
> -		 * Issue in chunks of the user defined max discard setting,
> -		 * ensuring that bi_size doesn't overflow
> -		 */
> -		req_sects = min_t(sector_t, nr_sects,
> -					q->limits.max_discard_sectors);
>   		if (!req_sects)
>   			goto fail;
>   		if (req_sects > UINT_MAX >> 9)
>   			req_sects = UINT_MAX >> 9;
>   
> -		/*
> -		 * If splitting a request, and the next starting sector would be
> -		 * misaligned, stop the discard at the previous aligned sector.
> -		 */
>   		end_sect = sector + req_sects;
> -		tmp = end_sect;
> -		if (req_sects < nr_sects &&
> -		    sector_div(tmp, granularity) != alignment) {
> -			end_sect = end_sect - alignment;
> -			sector_div(end_sect, granularity);
> -			end_sect = end_sect * granularity + alignment;
> -			req_sects = end_sect - sector;
> -		}
>   
>   		bio = next_bio(bio, 0, gfp_mask);
>   		bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = sector;
> 

Tested-by: Mariusz Dabrowski <mariusz.dabrowski@xxxxxxxxx>

Regards,
Mariusz




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux