On 9/28/18 9:13 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 28/09/2018 14:45, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 9/28/18 3:28 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> Commit a46b53672b2c2e3770b38a4abf90d16364d2584b ("xen/blkfront: cleanup
>>> stale persistent grants") introduced a regression as purged persistent
>>> grants were not pu into the list of free grants again. Correct that.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c | 4 ++--
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
>>> index a71d817e900d..429d20131c7e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
>>> @@ -2670,8 +2670,8 @@ static void purge_persistent_grants(struct blkfront_info *info)
>>> list_del(&gnt_list_entry->node);
>>> gnttab_end_foreign_access(gnt_list_entry->gref, 0, 0UL);
>>> rinfo->persistent_gnts_c--;
>>> - __free_page(gnt_list_entry->page);
>>> - kfree(gnt_list_entry);
>>> + gnt_list_entry->gref = GRANT_INVALID_REF;
>>> + list_add_tail(&gnt_list_entry->node, &rinfo->grants);
>> Sorry, I don't follow this. What is the purpose of removing the grant
>> from rinfo->grants list with list_del() and then adding it back with
>> list_add_tail()?
> The persistent grants are at the list head and the non-persistent ones
> at the tail.
Oh, I didn't realize that. But isn't that an optimization (and so not
following this rule should not cause errors)?
-boris
