Re: [PATCH v2] block/loop: Use global lock for ioctl() operation.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue 25-09-18 13:21:01, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> syzbot is reporting NULL pointer dereference [1] which is caused by
> race condition between ioctl(loop_fd, LOOP_CLR_FD, 0) versus
> ioctl(other_loop_fd, LOOP_SET_FD, loop_fd) due to traversing other
> loop devices at loop_validate_file() without holding corresponding
> lo->lo_ctl_mutex locks.
> 
> Since ioctl() request on loop devices is not frequent operation, we don't
> need fine grained locking. Let's use global lock in order to allow safe
> traversal at loop_validate_file().
> 
> Note that syzbot is also reporting circular locking dependency between
> bdev->bd_mutex and lo->lo_ctl_mutex [2] which is caused by calling
> blkdev_reread_part() with lock held. This patch does not address it.
> 
> [1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=f3cfe26e785d85f9ee259f385515291d21bd80a3
> [2] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=bf154052f0eea4bc7712499e4569505907d15889
> 
> v2: Don't call mutex_init() upon loop_add() request.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reported-by: syzbot <syzbot+bf89c128e05dd6c62523@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Yeah, this is really simple! Thank you for the patch. You can add:

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>

As a separate cleanup patch, you could drop loop_index_mutex and use
loop_ctl_mutex instead as there's now no reason to have two of them. But it
would not be completely trivial AFAICS.

								Honza

> ---
>  drivers/block/loop.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
>  drivers/block/loop.h |  1 -
>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
> index c2745e6..920cbb1 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/loop.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
> @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@
>  
>  static DEFINE_IDR(loop_index_idr);
>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(loop_index_mutex);
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(loop_ctl_mutex);
>  
>  static int max_part;
>  static int part_shift;
> @@ -1048,7 +1049,7 @@ static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo)
>  	 */
>  	if (atomic_read(&lo->lo_refcnt) > 1) {
>  		lo->lo_flags |= LO_FLAGS_AUTOCLEAR;
> -		mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> +		mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
>  		return 0;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -1101,12 +1102,12 @@ static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo)
>  	if (!part_shift)
>  		lo->lo_disk->flags |= GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN;
>  	loop_unprepare_queue(lo);
> -	mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> +	mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
>  	/*
> -	 * Need not hold lo_ctl_mutex to fput backing file.
> -	 * Calling fput holding lo_ctl_mutex triggers a circular
> +	 * Need not hold loop_ctl_mutex to fput backing file.
> +	 * Calling fput holding loop_ctl_mutex triggers a circular
>  	 * lock dependency possibility warning as fput can take
> -	 * bd_mutex which is usually taken before lo_ctl_mutex.
> +	 * bd_mutex which is usually taken before loop_ctl_mutex.
>  	 */
>  	fput(filp);
>  	return 0;
> @@ -1211,7 +1212,7 @@ static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo)
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	if (lo->lo_state != Lo_bound) {
> -		mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> +		mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
>  		return -ENXIO;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -1230,10 +1231,10 @@ static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo)
>  		       lo->lo_encrypt_key_size);
>  	}
>  
> -	/* Drop lo_ctl_mutex while we call into the filesystem. */
> +	/* Drop loop_ctl_mutex while we call into the filesystem. */
>  	path = lo->lo_backing_file->f_path;
>  	path_get(&path);
> -	mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> +	mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
>  	ret = vfs_getattr(&path, &stat, STATX_INO, AT_STATX_SYNC_AS_STAT);
>  	if (!ret) {
>  		info->lo_device = huge_encode_dev(stat.dev);
> @@ -1325,7 +1326,7 @@ static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo)
>  	int err;
>  
>  	if (!arg) {
> -		mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> +		mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  	err = loop_get_status(lo, &info64);
> @@ -1343,7 +1344,7 @@ static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo)
>  	int err;
>  
>  	if (!arg) {
> -		mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> +		mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  	err = loop_get_status(lo, &info64);
> @@ -1401,7 +1402,7 @@ static int lo_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode,
>  	struct loop_device *lo = bdev->bd_disk->private_data;
>  	int err;
>  
> -	err = mutex_lock_killable_nested(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex, 1);
> +	err = mutex_lock_killable_nested(&loop_ctl_mutex, 1);
>  	if (err)
>  		goto out_unlocked;
>  
> @@ -1413,7 +1414,7 @@ static int lo_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode,
>  		err = loop_change_fd(lo, bdev, arg);
>  		break;
>  	case LOOP_CLR_FD:
> -		/* loop_clr_fd would have unlocked lo_ctl_mutex on success */
> +		/* loop_clr_fd would have unlocked loop_ctl_mutex on success */
>  		err = loop_clr_fd(lo);
>  		if (!err)
>  			goto out_unlocked;
> @@ -1426,7 +1427,7 @@ static int lo_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode,
>  		break;
>  	case LOOP_GET_STATUS:
>  		err = loop_get_status_old(lo, (struct loop_info __user *) arg);
> -		/* loop_get_status() unlocks lo_ctl_mutex */
> +		/* loop_get_status() unlocks loop_ctl_mutex */
>  		goto out_unlocked;
>  	case LOOP_SET_STATUS64:
>  		err = -EPERM;
> @@ -1436,7 +1437,7 @@ static int lo_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode,
>  		break;
>  	case LOOP_GET_STATUS64:
>  		err = loop_get_status64(lo, (struct loop_info64 __user *) arg);
> -		/* loop_get_status() unlocks lo_ctl_mutex */
> +		/* loop_get_status() unlocks loop_ctl_mutex */
>  		goto out_unlocked;
>  	case LOOP_SET_CAPACITY:
>  		err = -EPERM;
> @@ -1456,7 +1457,7 @@ static int lo_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode,
>  	default:
>  		err = lo->ioctl ? lo->ioctl(lo, cmd, arg) : -EINVAL;
>  	}
> -	mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> +	mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
>  
>  out_unlocked:
>  	return err;
> @@ -1573,7 +1574,7 @@ struct compat_loop_info {
>  	int err;
>  
>  	if (!arg) {
> -		mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> +		mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  	err = loop_get_status(lo, &info64);
> @@ -1590,19 +1591,19 @@ static int lo_compat_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode,
>  
>  	switch(cmd) {
>  	case LOOP_SET_STATUS:
> -		err = mutex_lock_killable(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> +		err = mutex_lock_killable(&loop_ctl_mutex);
>  		if (!err) {
>  			err = loop_set_status_compat(lo,
>  						     (const struct compat_loop_info __user *)arg);
> -			mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> +			mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
>  		}
>  		break;
>  	case LOOP_GET_STATUS:
> -		err = mutex_lock_killable(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> +		err = mutex_lock_killable(&loop_ctl_mutex);
>  		if (!err) {
>  			err = loop_get_status_compat(lo,
>  						     (struct compat_loop_info __user *)arg);
> -			/* loop_get_status() unlocks lo_ctl_mutex */
> +			/* loop_get_status() unlocks loop_ctl_mutex */
>  		}
>  		break;
>  	case LOOP_SET_CAPACITY:
> @@ -1649,7 +1650,7 @@ static void __lo_release(struct loop_device *lo)
>  	if (atomic_dec_return(&lo->lo_refcnt))
>  		return;
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> +	mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
>  	if (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_AUTOCLEAR) {
>  		/*
>  		 * In autoclear mode, stop the loop thread
> @@ -1667,7 +1668,7 @@ static void __lo_release(struct loop_device *lo)
>  		blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(lo->lo_queue);
>  	}
>  
> -	mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> +	mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
>  }
>  
>  static void lo_release(struct gendisk *disk, fmode_t mode)
> @@ -1713,10 +1714,10 @@ static int unregister_transfer_cb(int id, void *ptr, void *data)
>  	struct loop_device *lo = ptr;
>  	struct loop_func_table *xfer = data;
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> +	mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
>  	if (lo->lo_encryption == xfer)
>  		loop_release_xfer(lo);
> -	mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> +	mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -1897,7 +1898,6 @@ static int loop_add(struct loop_device **l, int i)
>  	if (!part_shift)
>  		disk->flags |= GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN;
>  	disk->flags |= GENHD_FL_EXT_DEVT;
> -	mutex_init(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
>  	atomic_set(&lo->lo_refcnt, 0);
>  	lo->lo_number		= i;
>  	spin_lock_init(&lo->lo_lock);
> @@ -2010,21 +2010,21 @@ static long loop_control_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
>  		ret = loop_lookup(&lo, parm);
>  		if (ret < 0)
>  			break;
> -		ret = mutex_lock_killable(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> +		ret = mutex_lock_killable(&loop_ctl_mutex);
>  		if (ret)
>  			break;
>  		if (lo->lo_state != Lo_unbound) {
>  			ret = -EBUSY;
> -			mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> +			mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
>  			break;
>  		}
>  		if (atomic_read(&lo->lo_refcnt) > 0) {
>  			ret = -EBUSY;
> -			mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> +			mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
>  			break;
>  		}
>  		lo->lo_disk->private_data = NULL;
> -		mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> +		mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
>  		idr_remove(&loop_index_idr, lo->lo_number);
>  		loop_remove(lo);
>  		break;
> diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.h b/drivers/block/loop.h
> index 4d42c7a..af75a5e 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/loop.h
> +++ b/drivers/block/loop.h
> @@ -54,7 +54,6 @@ struct loop_device {
>  
>  	spinlock_t		lo_lock;
>  	int			lo_state;
> -	struct mutex		lo_ctl_mutex;
>  	struct kthread_worker	worker;
>  	struct task_struct	*worker_task;
>  	bool			use_dio;
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux