Re: [PATCH v3 (resend)] block/loop: Serialize ioctl operations.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello, Ming Lei.

I'd like to hear your comment on this patch regarding the ordering of
stopping kernel thread.

  > In order to enforce this strategy, this patch inversed
  > loop_reread_partitions() and loop_unprepare_queue() in loop_clr_fd().
  > I don't know whether it breaks something, but I don't have testcases.

Until 3.19, kthread_stop(lo->lo_thread) was called before
ioctl_by_bdev(bdev, BLKRRPART, 0) is called.
During 4.0 to 4.3, the loop module was using "kloopd" workqueue.
But since 4.4, loop_reread_partitions(lo, bdev) is called before
loop_unprepare_queue(lo) is called. And this patch is trying to change to
call loop_unprepare_queue() before loop_reread_partitions() is called.
Is there some reason we need to preserve current ordering?

Relevant commits:

  commit b5dd2f6047ca108001328aac0e8588edd15f1778
  block: loop: improve performance via blk-mq

  commit e03a3d7a94e2485b6e2fa3fb630b9b3a30b65718
  block: loop: use kthread_work



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux