On Thu, 2018-09-20 at 09:35 +-0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: +AD4 On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 03:45:23PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: +AD4 +AD4 +-/+ACo +AD4 +AD4 +- +ACo Call function +AEA-fn(+AEA-hctx, rq, +AEA-data, +AEA-reserved) for each request +AD4 +AD4 queued on +AD4 +AD4 +- +ACo +AEA-hctx that has been assigned a driver tag. +AEA-reserved indicates +AD4 +AD4 whether +AEA-bt +AD4 +AD4 +- +ACo is the breserved+AF8-tags member or the bitmap+AF8-tags member of +AD4 +AD4 struct +AD4 +AD4 +- +ACo blk+AF8-mq+AF8-tags. +AD4 +AD4 +- +ACo-/ +AD4 +AD4 static void bt+AF8-for+AF8-each(struct blk+AF8-mq+AF8-hw+AF8-ctx +ACo-hctx, struct +AD4 +AD4 sbitmap+AF8-queue +ACo-bt, +AD4 +AD4 busy+AF8-iter+AF8-fn +ACo-fn, void +ACo-data, bool +AD4 +AD4 reserved) +AD4 +AD4 One minor nit and only if you have to re-send the series, can you +AD4 please also add the usual kernel-doc headers to the comments, i.e.: OK, I will use the kernel-doc format. +AD4 Otherwise: +AD4 Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn +ADw-jthumshirn+AEA-suse.de+AD4 Thanks+ACE Bart.
