Re: [PATCH] block: umem: replace spin_lock_bh with spin_lock in tasklet callback

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: jun qian <hangdianqj@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: umem: replace spin_lock_bh with spin_lock in tasklet callback
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 11:34:41 -0600
Cc: linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20180907172720.48621-1-hangdianqj@163.com>
References: <20180907172720.48621-1-hangdianqj@163.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.0

On 9/7/18 11:27 AM, jun qian wrote:
> As you are already in a tasklet, it is unnecessary to call spin_lock_bh.

Looks good to me, applied.

-- 
Jens Axboe

References:
- [PATCH] block: umem: replace spin_lock_bh with spin_lock in tasklet callback
  - From: jun qian

Prev by Date: [PATCH] block: umem: replace spin_lock_bh with spin_lock in tasklet callback
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 09/12] blkcg: remove additional reference to the css
Previous by thread: [PATCH] block: umem: replace spin_lock_bh with spin_lock in tasklet callback
Next by thread: [PATCH 4.18 076/145] tracing/blktrace: Fix to allow setting same value
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ATA RAID] [IDE] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux