(Was: [PATCH] block, bfq: return nbytes and not zero from struct cftype .write() method)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: (Was: [PATCH] block, bfq: return nbytes and not zero from struct cftype .write() method)
From: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 16:38:52 +0200
Cc: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Arianna Avanzini <avanzini.arianna@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <cb3a6209-9474-2b4d-1ff8-2e2f7c3367fb@kernel.dk>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
References: <f574e019-00f2-96c3-fc32-541c6584ca96@maciej.szmigiero.name> <19c68f93-017d-cda1-632f-039ca3ca0158@kernel.dk> <1f2ca124-bb7c-d02c-07cd-4afe6a634ee6@maciej.szmigiero.name> <cb3a6209-9474-2b4d-1ff8-2e2f7c3367fb@kernel.dk>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.0

On 17.08.2018 19:38, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 8/17/18 11:27 AM, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
>> On 16.08.2018 21:11, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> Just a heads-up that gmail thinks your email is spam.
>>
>> Thanks for the information - it looks like gmail just doesn't like my
>> email server for some reason.
> 
> This one came through fine, jfyi.

Were my two patches from 17.08 able to make it through the filter?

Thanks,
Maciej

References:
- [PATCH] block, bfq: return nbytes and not zero from struct cftype .write() method
  - From: Maciej S. Szmigiero
- Re: [PATCH] block, bfq: return nbytes and not zero from struct cftype .write() method
  - From: Jens Axboe
- Re: [PATCH] block, bfq: return nbytes and not zero from struct cftype .write() method
  - From: Maciej S. Szmigiero
- Re: [PATCH] block, bfq: return nbytes and not zero from struct cftype .write() method
  - From: Jens Axboe

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] block: Fix unneeded NULL check
Next by Date: [PATCH] Revert "blk-mq: issue directly if hw queue isn't busy in case of 'none'"
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] block, bfq: return nbytes and not zero from struct cftype .write() method
Next by thread: [PATCH 2/2] tracing/blktrace: Fix to allow setting same value
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ATA RAID] [IDE] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Device Mapper]