On Tue, 2018-08-14 at 17:39 +-0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: +AD4- While I have considered having nvme+AF8-nvm+AF8-register+AF8-sysfs() returning a +AD4- pointer I would then have to remove the 'static' declaration from the +AD4- nvm+AF8-dev+AF8-attr+AF8-group+AF8-12/20. +AD4- Which I didn't really like, either. Hmm ... I don't see why the static declaration would have to be removed from nvm+AF8-dev+AF8-attr+AF8-group+AF8-12/20 if nvme+AF8-nvm+AF8-register+AF8-sysfs() would return a pointer? Am I perhaps missing something? Thanks, Bart.
