Re: [PATCH v6 10/12] block: Change the runtime power management approach (1/2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2018-08-10 at 09:59 +-0800, jianchao.wang wrote:
+AD4- On 08/10/2018 03:41 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
+AD4- +AD4- Instead of scheduling runtime resume of a request queue after a
+AD4- +AD4- request has been queued, schedule asynchronous resume during request
+AD4- +AD4- allocation. The new pm+AF8-request+AF8-resume() calls occur after
+AD4- +AD4- blk+AF8-queue+AF8-enter() has increased the q+AF8-usage+AF8-counter request queue
+AD4- 
+AD4-                         +AF4AXgBeAF4AXgBeAF4AXgBeAF4AXgBeAF4AXgBeAF4AXgBeAF4AXgBeAF4AXgBeAF4AXgBeAF4AXgBeAF4AXgBeAF4AXgBeAF4AXgBeAF4AXgBeAF4-
+AD4- +AD4- member. This change is needed for a later patch that will make request
+AD4- +AD4- allocation block while the queue status is not RPM+AF8-ACTIVE.
+AD4- 
+AD4- Is it +ACI-after getting q-+AD4-q+AF8-usage+AF8-counter fails+ACI- ?
+AD4- And also this blk+AF8-pm+AF8-request+AF8-resume  will not affect the normal path. +ADs-)

Right, the commit message needs to be brought in sync with the code.

Bart.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux