Hi Bart
On 08/10/2018 03:41 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> +void blk_pm_runtime_exit(struct request_queue *q)
> +{
> + if (!q->dev)
> + return;
> +
> + pm_runtime_get_sync(q->dev);
> + q->dev = NULL;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_pm_runtime_exit);
> +
> /**
> * blk_pre_runtime_suspend - Pre runtime suspend check
> * @q: the queue of the device
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> index 69ab459abb98..5537762dfcfd 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> @@ -3420,12 +3420,11 @@ static int sd_probe(struct device *dev)
> **/
> static int sd_remove(struct device *dev)
> {
> - struct scsi_disk *sdkp;
> - dev_t devt;
> + struct scsi_disk *sdkp = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + struct scsi_device *sdp = sdkp->device;
> + dev_t devt = disk_devt(sdkp->disk);
>
> - sdkp = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> - devt = disk_devt(sdkp->disk);
> - scsi_autopm_get_device(sdkp->device);
> + blk_pm_runtime_exit(sdp->request_queue)
Based on __scsi_device_remove, sd_remove will be invoked before blk_cleanup_queue.
So it should be not safe that we set the q->dev to NULL here.
We have following operations in followed patch:
+static inline void blk_pm_mark_last_busy(struct request *rq)
+{
+ if (rq->q->dev && !(rq->rq_flags & RQF_PM))
+ pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(rq->q->dev);
+}
Thanks
Jianchao
