From: Shenghui Wang <shhuiw@xxxxxxxxxxx>
The pr_err statement in the code for sysfs_attatch section would run
for various error codes, which maybe confusing.
E.g,
Run the command twice:
echo 796b5c05-b03c-4bc7-9cbd-a8df5e8be891 > \
/sys/block/bcache0/bcache/attach
[the backing dev got attached on the first run]
echo 796b5c05-b03c-4bc7-9cbd-a8df5e8be891 > \
/sys/block/bcache0/bcache/attach
In dmesg, after the command run twice, we can get:
bcache: bch_cached_dev_attach() Can't attach sda6: already attached
bcache: __cached_dev_store() Can't attach 796b5c05-b03c-4bc7-9cbd-\
a8df5e8be891
: cache set not found
The first statement in the message was right, but the second was
confusing.
bch_cached_dev_attach has various pr_ statements for various error
codes, except ENOENT.
After the change, rerun above command twice:
echo 796b5c05-b03c-4bc7-9cbd-a8df5e8be891 > \
/sys/block/bcache0/bcache/attach
echo 796b5c05-b03c-4bc7-9cbd-a8df5e8be891 > \
/sys/block/bcache0/bcache/attach
In dmesg we only got:
bcache: bch_cached_dev_attach() Can't attach sda6: already attached
No confusing "cache set not found" message anymore.
And for some not exist SET-UUID:
echo 796b5c05-b03c-4bc7-9cbd-a8df5e8be898 > \
/sys/block/bcache0/bcache/attach
In dmesg we can get:
bcache: __cached_dev_store() Can't attach 796b5c05-b03c-4bc7-9cbd-\
a8df5e8be898
: cache set not found
Signed-off-by: Shenghui Wang <shhuiw@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c b/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c
index 6e88142514fb..22f8565d2bf1 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c
@@ -351,8 +351,8 @@ STORE(__cached_dev)
if (!v)
return size;
}
-
- pr_err("Can't attach %s: cache set not found", buf);
+ if (v == -ENOENT)
+ pr_err("Can't attach %s: cache set not found", buf);
return v;
}
--
2.18.0
