On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 09:23:32PM +0000, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote: > Hi Hannes, > > Thanks for the test, this is really helpful, please see my inline comments to individual patches. > > Also, the test number should be I guess 18, 14-17 testcases are still in the queue. Yeah, sorry about that, I'll take another look. > Omar, can you please let us know when can you merge the remaining testcases for NVMeOF > from the first round that I've posted? so we can set the right number for this. No need to worry about the numbering, I can trivially renumber it here. > > From: linux-block-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <linux-block-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2018 6:31 AM > To: Omar Sandoval > Cc: Christoph Hellwig; Sagi Grimberg; Keith Busch; linux-nvme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Hannes Reinecke > Subject: [PATCH 0/2] blktests: test ANA base support > > > Hi all, > > here's a small patchset for testing ANA base support. > The test itself requires the ANA patchset from Christoph, plus > the fixes I've sent to the mailing list earlier. > > Hannes Reinecke (2): > blktests: enable ANA support > blktests: add test for ANA state transition > > tests/nvme/014 | 158 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > tests/nvme/014.out | 17 ++++++ > tests/nvme/rc | 49 ++++++++++++++++- > 3 files changed, 221 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > create mode 100755 tests/nvme/014 > create mode 100644 tests/nvme/014.out > > -- > 2.12.3 > >
