On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 09:54:38PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>
> Christoph,
>
> >> +void blk_integrity_dif_prepare(struct request *rq, u8 protection_type,
> >> + u32 ref_tag)
> >> +{
> >
> > Maybe call this blk_t10_pi_prepare?
>
> The rest of these functions have a blk_integrity_ prefix. So either
> stick with that or put the functions in t10-pi.c and use a t10_pi_
> prefix.
Yes, I suggested moving it somewhere in my reply.
