Re: [PATCH] block: ioprio: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL in set_task_ioprio()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: ioprio: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL in set_task_ioprio()
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 00:18:04 -0700
Cc: axboe@xxxxxxxxx, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20180723022116.6919-1-baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
References: <20180723022116.6919-1-baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)

Looks good,

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

But to me it seems that btrfs and maybe ext4 as well would be much
better off just setting a per-IO priority in the bio.

Any chance yo could look into that?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] block: ioprio: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL in set_task_ioprio()
  - From: Tetsuo Handa
- Re: [PATCH] block: ioprio: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL in set_task_ioprio()
  - From: Jia-Ju Bai

References:
- [PATCH] block: ioprio: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL in set_task_ioprio()
  - From: Jia-Ju Bai

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] bcache: set max writeback rate when I/O request is idle
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: move dif_prepare/dif_complete functions to block layer
Previous by thread: [PATCH] block: ioprio: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL in set_task_ioprio()
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] block: ioprio: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL in set_task_ioprio()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ATA RAID] [IDE] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux