Re: [PATCH RFC V2 0/3] blk-mq: support runtime PM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/13/18 2:05 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> Hi Guys,
> 
> Runtime PM is usually enabled for SCSI devices, and we are switching to
> SCSI_MQ recently, but runtime PM isn't supported yet by blk-mq, and
> people may complain that.
> 
> This patch tries to support runtime PM for blk-mq. And one chanllenge is
> that it can be quite expensive to account the active in-flight IOs for
> figuring out when to mark the last busy. This patch simply marks busy
> after each non-PM IO is done, and this way is workable because:
> 
> 1) pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() is very cheap
> 
> 2) in-flight non-PM IO is checked in blk_pre_runtime_suspend(), so
> if there is any IO queued, the device will be prevented from being
> suspened.
> 
> 3) Generally speaking, autosuspend_delay_ms is often big, and should
> be in unit of second, so it shouldn't be a big deal to check if queue
> is idle in blk_pre_runtime_suspend().
> 
> 
> V2:
> 	- re-organize code as suggested by Christoph
> 	- use seqlock to sync runtime PM and IO path

See other mail on why this is not going to be acceptable.

-- 
Jens Axboe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux