Re: [PATCH] block/loop: mark expected switch fall-through

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block/loop: mark expected switch fall-through
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 15:11:14 -0600
Cc: linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20180702175206.GA18848@embeddedor.com>
References: <20180702175206.GA18848@embeddedor.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.0

On 7/2/18 11:52 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.

Applied, thanks.

-- 
Jens Axboe

References:
- [PATCH] block/loop: mark expected switch fall-through
  - From: Gustavo A. R. Silva

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] drbd: mark expected switch fall-throughs
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 14/14] skip readahead if the cgroup is congested
Previous by thread: [PATCH] block/loop: mark expected switch fall-through
Next by thread: [PATCH] loop: Add LOOP_SET_BLOCK_SIZE in compat ioctl
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ATA RAID] [IDE] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux