Re: [PATCH V3 3/3] blk-mq: dequeue request one by one from sw queue iff hctx is busy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/2/18 3:36 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> It won't be efficient to dequeue request one by one from sw queue,
> but we have to do that when queue is busy for better merge performance.
> 
> This patch takes EWMA to figure out if queue is busy, then only dequeue
> request one by one from sw queue when queue is busy.

Just one minor comment, since you're going to be updating this one
anyway:

> @@ -1209,8 +1234,11 @@ bool blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(struct request_queue *q, struct list_head *list,
>  		else if (needs_restart && (ret == BLK_STS_RESOURCE))
>  			blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue(hctx, BLK_MQ_RESOURCE_DELAY);
>  
> +		blk_mq_update_hctx_busy(hctx, true);
> +
>  		return false;

Kill that newline between update and return.

Rest looks fine to me now, though I do agree with Christophs comments on
making the weight and factor in caps.

Applying 1-2/3 so far.

-- 
Jens Axboe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux