On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 08:58:16AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 6/29/18 2:12 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> > It won't be efficient to dequeue request one by one from sw queue,
> > but we have to do that when queue is busy for better merge performance.
> >
> > This patch takes EWMA to figure out if queue is busy, then only dequeue
> > request one by one from sw queue when queue is busy.
> >
> > Kashyap verified that this patch basically brings back rand IO perf
> > on megasas_raid in case of none io scheduler. Meantime I tried this
> > patch on HDD, and not see obvious performance loss on sequential IO
> > test too.
>
> Outside of the comments of others, please also export ->busy from
> the blk-mq debugfs code.
Good idea!
>
> > diff --git a/include/linux/blk-mq.h b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
> > index e3147eb74222..a5113e22d720 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/blk-mq.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
> > @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ struct blk_mq_hw_ctx {
> >
> > struct sbitmap ctx_map;
> >
> > + unsigned int busy;
> > struct blk_mq_ctx *dispatch_from;
> >
> > struct blk_mq_ctx **ctxs;
>
> This adds another hole. Consider swapping it a bit, ala:
>
> struct blk_mq_ctx *dispatch_from;
> unsigned int busy;
>
> unsigned int nr_ctx;
> struct blk_mq_ctx **ctxs;
>
> to eliminate a hole, instead of adding one more.
OK
Thanks,
Ming
