Hi Michael,
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 11:08 AM Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Am 29.06.18 um 20:51 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven:
> >> Would MSDOS recognize the GPT partition as 'probably FAT', and attempt
> >> to use it?
> > No idea...
> >
> > Probably some old Windows or MacOS versions will just suggest to
> > format your "new" disk ;-)
>
> Yep, that's what I'd expect. Windows even used to trash the LILO boot
> code in the MBR if you just happened to boot to it by accident. Did we
> complain?
Those days Linux users just knew not to use Windows ;-)
> > But it's up to the person (which is not Linux) formatting the disk to
> > not try to use
> > it on systems that cannot handle it, and may destroy it.
> >
> >>> Let me clarify: what exactly would the kernel option allow? When to use it?
> >> Whether to use it if safe (on Linux). But whatever Linux does (after
> >> this patch), access will go to the right area of the disk (as specified
> >> by the RDB) so Linux won't any longer stomp on anything that would have
> >> mattered to 32 bit disk drivers. So it really should be safe.
> > Personally, I see no reason to depend on a kernel option, if it is safe to use.
> > Just use it.
>
> So to recap - someone partitions a disk on AmigaOS 4.x, taking advantage
> of the large block device support there.
> Using that disk on AmigaOS 3.1, data loss ensues. Whether or not Linux
> (patched) ever touched the disk has no impact on that outcome.
>
> Right?
That's my understanding, too.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
