Re: [PATCH] block: Simplify the bio cloning implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 04:55:20PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 06/27/18 16:21, Ming Lei wrote:
> > What we need to do is to only copy the 1st bvec for WRITE_SAME, your patch
> > changes to copy (bio->bi_iter.bi_size / block size) bvecs, then memory corruption
> > may be triggered. So bio_for_each_segment() can't be used here.
> 
> Has it been considered to use memcpy() to copy the bi_vcnt bio_vecs instead
> of using bio_for_each_segment() in bio_clone_bioset()? That will in this
> context probably be even faster than using bio_for_each_segment().

After immutable bvec is introduced:

1) there is little chance in which bvec table need to copy, so performance
may not be a issue, as you see, bio_clone_bioset() is going to die now.

2) bi_vcnt/bi_io_vec can't be used directly on fast-cloned bio

2) code is simplified a lot by using iterator helper since bio can be
advanced in unit of byte. In theory, we may cook a special helper to
speed up the copy, but still depends on use cases.

thanks,
Ming



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux