On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 10:05:41AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 06/22/18 20:15, Ming Lei wrote: > > Just tried srp/001 > > > > [root@ktest-04 blktests]# ./check srp/001 > > srp/001 (Create and remove LUNs) [failed] > > runtime 0.912s ... 18.358s > > --- tests/srp/001.out 2018-06-23 02:41:33.267925950 +0000 > > +++ results/nodev/srp/001.out.bad 2018-06-23 03:11:30.062799405 +0000 > > @@ -1,8 +1,27 @@ > > -Unloaded the ib_srpt kernel module > > +Unloaded the ib_srp kernel module > > +modprobe: FATAL: Module target_core_mod is in use. > > +modprobe: FATAL: Module target_core_mod is in use. > > +modprobe: FATAL: Module target_core_mod is in use. > > +modprobe: FATAL: Module target_core_mod is in use. > > +modprobe: FATAL: Module target_core_mod is in use. > > ... > > (Run 'diff -u tests/srp/001.out results/nodev/srp/001.out.bad' to > > see the entire diff) > > > > [root@ktest-04 blktests]# lsmod | grep target > > iscsi_target_mod 303104 1 ib_isert > > target_core_mod 356352 2 iscsi_target_mod,ib_isert > > LIO must be unconfigured before the SRP tests are run. The above output > shows that LIO was already loaded before the SRP tests were started. I will > add a test that prevents the SRP tests to start if LIO was already > configured. I run SRP test on Fedora 27, and not run any LIO specific commands to load it, seems it is done automatically. So looks it might not a good idea to fail SRP test if LIO is loaded, just wondering why your SRP test can't make the two co-exist? Thanks, Ming
