4.16-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Roman Pen <roman.penyaev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
commit a347c7ad8edf4c5685154f3fdc3c12fc1db800ba upstream.
It is not allowed to reinit q->tag_set_list list entry while RCU grace
period has not completed yet, otherwise the following soft lockup in
blk_mq_sched_restart() happens:
[ 1064.252652] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#12 stuck for 23s! [fio:9270]
[ 1064.254445] task: ffff99b912e8b900 task.stack: ffffa6d54c758000
[ 1064.254613] RIP: 0010:blk_mq_sched_restart+0x96/0x150
[ 1064.256510] Call Trace:
[ 1064.256664] <IRQ>
[ 1064.256824] blk_mq_free_request+0xea/0x100
[ 1064.256987] msg_io_conf+0x59/0xd0 [ibnbd_client]
[ 1064.257175] complete_rdma_req+0xf2/0x230 [ibtrs_client]
[ 1064.257340] ? ibtrs_post_recv_empty+0x4d/0x70 [ibtrs_core]
[ 1064.257502] ibtrs_clt_rdma_done+0xd1/0x1e0 [ibtrs_client]
[ 1064.257669] ib_create_qp+0x321/0x380 [ib_core]
[ 1064.257841] ib_process_cq_direct+0xbd/0x120 [ib_core]
[ 1064.258007] irq_poll_softirq+0xb7/0xe0
[ 1064.258165] __do_softirq+0x106/0x2a2
[ 1064.258328] irq_exit+0x92/0xa0
[ 1064.258509] do_IRQ+0x4a/0xd0
[ 1064.258660] common_interrupt+0x7a/0x7a
[ 1064.258818] </IRQ>
Meanwhile another context frees other queue but with the same set of
shared tags:
[ 1288.201183] INFO: task bash:5910 blocked for more than 180 seconds.
[ 1288.201833] bash D 0 5910 5820 0x00000000
[ 1288.202016] Call Trace:
[ 1288.202315] schedule+0x32/0x80
[ 1288.202462] schedule_timeout+0x1e5/0x380
[ 1288.203838] wait_for_completion+0xb0/0x120
[ 1288.204137] __wait_rcu_gp+0x125/0x160
[ 1288.204287] synchronize_sched+0x6e/0x80
[ 1288.204770] blk_mq_free_queue+0x74/0xe0
[ 1288.204922] blk_cleanup_queue+0xc7/0x110
[ 1288.205073] ibnbd_clt_unmap_device+0x1bc/0x280 [ibnbd_client]
[ 1288.205389] ibnbd_clt_unmap_dev_store+0x169/0x1f0 [ibnbd_client]
[ 1288.205548] kernfs_fop_write+0x109/0x180
[ 1288.206328] vfs_write+0xb3/0x1a0
[ 1288.206476] SyS_write+0x52/0xc0
[ 1288.206624] do_syscall_64+0x68/0x1d0
[ 1288.206774] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x3d/0xa2
What happened is the following:
1. There are several MQ queues with shared tags.
2. One queue is about to be freed and now task is in
blk_mq_del_queue_tag_set().
3. Other CPU is in blk_mq_sched_restart() and loops over all queues in
tag list in order to find hctx to restart.
Because linked list entry was modified in blk_mq_del_queue_tag_set()
without proper waiting for a grace period, blk_mq_sched_restart()
never ends, spining in list_for_each_entry_rcu_rr(), thus soft lockup.
Fix is simple: reinit list entry after an RCU grace period elapsed.
Fixes: Fixes: 705cda97ee3a ("blk-mq: Make it safe to use RCU to iterate over blk_mq_tag_set.tag_list")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Roman Pen <roman.penyaev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
block/blk-mq.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -2513,7 +2513,6 @@ static void blk_mq_del_queue_tag_set(str
mutex_lock(&set->tag_list_lock);
list_del_rcu(&q->tag_set_list);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&q->tag_set_list);
if (list_is_singular(&set->tag_list)) {
/* just transitioned to unshared */
set->flags &= ~BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED;
@@ -2521,8 +2520,8 @@ static void blk_mq_del_queue_tag_set(str
blk_mq_update_tag_set_depth(set, false);
}
mutex_unlock(&set->tag_list_lock);
-
synchronize_rcu();
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&q->tag_set_list);
}
static void blk_mq_add_queue_tag_set(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
