RE: [PATCH v5] block: add verifier for cmdline partition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



ACK.

the patch is OK for me

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wang YanQing [mailto:udknight@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2018 5:39 PM
> To: axboe@xxxxxxxxx; gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> pombredanne@xxxxxxxx; tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Caizhiyong
> <caizhiyong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Jiangheng
> <jiangheng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] block: add verifier for cmdline partition
> 
> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:06:37AM +0800, Wang YanQing wrote:
> > I meet strange filesystem corruption issue recently, the reason
> > is there are overlaps partitions in cmdline partition argument.
> >
> > This patch add verifier for cmdline partition, then if there are
> > overlaps partitions, cmdline_partition will log a warning. We don't
> > treat overlaps partition as a error:
> > "
> > Caizhiyong <caizhiyong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
> > Partition overlap was intentionally designed in this cmdline partition.
> > reference http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2013-
> August/048092.html
> > "
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wang YanQing <udknight@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  Changes
> >  v4-v5:
> >  1:Delete unnecessary blank line at begin and end of logs.
> >  2:Delete newline character in log, pr_* will add newline
> >    automatically.
> >
> >  v3-v4:
> >  1:Fix grammar typo, reported by Randy Dunlap.
> >  2:Delete unnecessary type casting, reported by Caizhiyong.
> >  3:Record the reason why we can't treat overlapping partitions
> >    as errors into changelog.
> >
> >  v2-v3:
> >  1:Fix log one pair of overlaps partitions twice in cmdline_parts_verifier.
> >  2:Fix out of bound access in cmdline_parts_verifier.
> >
> >  v1-v2:
> >  1:Don't treat overlaps partition as a error, but log a warning.
> >
> >  Hi! Jens Axboe
> >
> >  What is your suggestion?
> Hi! All
> 
> I just want to know what is the status about this patch?
> 
> ACK or NACK is welcome.
> 
> Thanks



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux