Re: [PATCH] Revert "block: Add warning for bi_next not NULL in bio_endio()"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 04:55:05PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> This patch avoids that KASAN reports the following complaint when
> running the srp-test software:

I made a real attempt to get your test suite working. It would be nice if you
could make an attempt at tracking it down instead of just reverting, and holding
up improvements to the whole block layer, since you seem to have an easy repro
for it.

This is a real looming issue - we have other code which assumes things about
bi_next and this isn't a practical thing to grep/audit for.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux