Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: Rework blk-mq timeout handling again

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Bart

On 05/14/2018 12:03 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-05-14 at 09:37 +0800, jianchao.wang wrote:
>> In addition, on a 64bit system, how do you set up the timer with a 32bit deadline ?
> 
> If timeout handling occurs less than (1 << 31) / HZ seconds after a request has been
> submitted then a 32-bit variable is sufficient to store the deadline. If you want to
> verify the implementation, please have a look at the int32_t variables in
> blk_mq_check_expired().
> 
a 32bit deadline is indeed OK to judge whether a request is timeout or not.
but how is the expires value determined for __blk_add_timer -> mod_timer ?
as we know, when a request is started, we need to arm a timer for it.
the expires value is 'unsigned long'.

Thanks
Jianchao 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux