Re: [PATCH 1/2] nvme: pci: simplify timeout handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 03:44:41PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 05:24:46AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > Could you share me the link?
> 
> The diff was in this reply here:
> 
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-nvme/2018-April/017019.html
> 
> > Firstly, the previous nvme_sync_queues() won't work reliably, so this
> > patch introduces blk_unquiesce_timeout() and blk_quiesce_timeout() for
> > this purpose.
> >
> > Secondly, I remembered that you only call nvme_sync_queues() at the
> > entry of nvme_reset_work(), but timeout(either admin or normal IO)
> > can happen again during resetting, that is another race addressed by
> > this patchset, but can't cover by your proposal.
> 
> I sync the queues at the beginning because it ensures there is not
> a single in flight request for the entire controller (all namespaces
> plus admin queue) before transitioning to the connecting state.

But it can't avoid the race I mentioned, since nvme_dev_disable() can
happen again during resetting.

> 
> If a command times out during connecting state, we go to the dead state.

That is too risky, since the IO during resetting isn't much different
with IOs submitted from other IO paths.

For example, in case of blktests block/011, controller shouldn't have
been put into dead, and this patchset(V4 & V5) can cover this case well.

Thanks,
Ming



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux