[PATCH 2/9] bfq-iosched: don't worry about reserved tags in limit_depth

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Reserved tags are used for error handling, we don't need to
care about them for regular IO. The core won't call us for these
anyway.

Acked-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 block/bfq-iosched.c | 9 +--------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
index eefd8a4bc936..db38e88a5670 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -542,14 +542,7 @@ static void bfq_limit_depth(unsigned int op, struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data)
 	if (op_is_sync(op) && !op_is_write(op))
 		return;
 
-	if (data->flags & BLK_MQ_REQ_RESERVED) {
-		if (unlikely(!tags->nr_reserved_tags)) {
-			WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
-			return;
-		}
-		bt = &tags->breserved_tags;
-	} else
-		bt = &tags->bitmap_tags;
+	bt = &tags->bitmap_tags;
 
 	if (unlikely(bfqd->sb_shift != bt->sb.shift))
 		bfq_update_depths(bfqd, bt);
-- 
2.7.4




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux