Re: [PATCH 11/12] swiotlb: move the SWIOTLB config symbol to lib/Kconfig

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 12:52:05AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 07:04:18PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > This way we have one central definition of it, and user can select it as
> > needed.  Note that we also add a second ARCH_HAS_SWIOTLB symbol to
> > indicate the architecture supports swiotlb at all, so that we can still
> > make the usage optional for a few architectures that want this feature
> > to be user selectable.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> 
> Hmm, this looks like we end up with NEED_SG_DMA_LENGTH=y on ARM by
> default, which probably isn't a good idea - ARM pre-dates the dma_length
> parameter in scatterlists, and I don't think all code is guaranteed to
> do the right thing if this is enabled.

We shouldn't end up with NEED_SG_DMA_LENGTH=y on ARM by default.
It is only select by ARM_DMA_USE_IOMMU before the patch, and it will
now also be selected by SWIOTLB, which for arm is never used or seleted
directly by anything but xen-swiotlb.

Then again looking at the series there shouldn't be any need to
even select NEED_SG_DMA_LENGTH for swiotlb, as we'll never merge segments,
so I'll fix that up.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux