On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 05:59:36PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 12:03:29PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I think I owe you a reply here... Sorry that it took so long.
>
> Took me just as long :)
>
> > On Fri 01-12-17 22:13:27, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > >
> > > I'll note that its still not perfectly clear if really the semantics behind
> > > freeze_bdev() match what I described above fully. That still needs to be
> > > vetted for. For instance, does thaw_bdev() keep a superblock frozen if we
> > > an ioctl initiated freeze had occurred before? If so then great. Otherwise
> > > I think we'll need to distinguish the ioctl interface. Worst possible case
> > > is that bdev semantics and in-kernel semantics differ somehow, then that
> > > will really create a holy fucking mess.
> >
> > I believe nobody really thought about mixing those two interfaces to fs
> > freezing and so the behavior is basically defined by the implementation.
> > That is:
> >
> > freeze_bdev() on sb frozen by ioctl_fsfreeze() -> EBUSY
> > freeze_bdev() on sb frozen by freeze_bdev() -> success
> > ioctl_fsfreeze() on sb frozen by freeze_bdev() -> EBUSY
> > ioctl_fsfreeze() on sb frozen by ioctl_fsfreeze() -> EBUSY
> >
> > thaw_bdev() on sb frozen by ioctl_fsfreeze() -> EINVAL
>
> Phew, so this is what we want for the in-kernel freezing so we're good
> and *can* combine these then.
I double checked, and I don't see where you get EINVAL for this case.
We *do* keep the sb frozen though, which is good, and the worst fear
I had was that we did not. However we return 0 if there was already
a prior freeze_bdev() or ioctl_fsfreeze() other than the context that
started the prior freeze (--bdev->bd_fsfreeze_count > 0).
The -EINVAL is only returned currently if there were no freezers.
int thaw_bdev(struct block_device *bdev, struct super_block *sb)
{
int error = -EINVAL;
mutex_lock(&bdev->bd_fsfreeze_mutex);
if (!bdev->bd_fsfreeze_count)
goto out;
error = 0;
if (--bdev->bd_fsfreeze_count > 0)
goto out;
...
out:
mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_fsfreeze_mutex);
return error;
}
Luis
