On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 10:31 PM, Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, 2018-04-15 at 19:35 -0600, Tim Walker wrote: >> I also believe the dual-actuator, or any significant HDD parallelism, >> would map well onto an NVMe target, or NVMe-oF behind nvmet. Maybe a >> lightweight virtual NVMe controller that would efficiently present the >> HDD logs/mode pages/etc via the admin queue and the LUNs as fixed >> namespaces...? >> >> Doug, I will flesh your three LUN idea out some more and send it up >> the flagpole over here. Thanks for the input. >> >> I'd like to have a conversation at LSFMM and maybe pull together a >> fairly well defined consensus recommendation. Is that possible? Can we >> schedule it? > > Hello Tim, > > I think that you have to submit a request to the LSF/MM program committee > (lsf-pc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) to add an item to the official agenda. > In case this topic wouldn't be added to the official agenda we can still > discuss this topic in a meeting room at the LSF/MM location. > > Bart. > > > Hello Bart- It would be good if we could set up an informal meeting time and location at LSFMM to discuss these dual actuator topics. so far you, Doug, Hannes, and Christoph have expressed the most interest, plus Damien. Can we set an hour aside one afternoon? -Tim -- Tim Walker Product Design Systems Engineering, Seagate Technology (303) 775-3770
