On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 03:22:07PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On Fri, 2018-04-13 at 21:06 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > > I like this approach since it keeps the cost outside of the fast > > path. And it's fine to reuse the queue lock for this, instead of > > adding a special lock for something we consider a rare occurrence. > > > > From a quick look this looks sane, but I'll take a closer look > > tomrrow and add some testing too. Jens, please hold on, I will post out V4 soon, which will improve V3 a bit. > > Shouldn't we know the root cause of the "RIP: scsi_times_out+0x17" crash reported in > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199077 before we decide how to proceed? I will ask Martin to test the V4 once it is posted out. Thanks, Ming
