Re: [PATCH 01/11] block: Reorder the queue flag manipulaton function definitions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] block: Reorder the queue flag manipulaton function definitions
From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 01:02:21 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Cc: "hch@xxxxxx" <hch@xxxxxx>, "jthumshirn@xxxxxxx" <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>, "linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "hare@xxxxxxx" <hare@xxxxxxx>, "axboe@xxxxxxxxx" <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, "ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx" <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <yq1vaeeulbd.fsf@oracle.com>
Wdcipoutbound: EOP-TRUE

On Fri, 2018-03-02 at 18:09 -0500, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> s/manipulaton/manipulation/ in Subject. Otherwise OK.

Will fix that typo. Thanks for the reviewing work!

Bart.

References:
- [PATCH 00/11] Make all concurrent queue flag manipulations safe
  - From: Bart Van Assche
- [PATCH 01/11] block: Reorder the queue flag manipulaton function definitions
  - From: Bart Van Assche
- Re: [PATCH 01/11] block: Reorder the queue flag manipulaton function definitions
  - From: Martin K. Petersen

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2] block: sed-opal: fix u64 short atom length
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] Return bytes transferred for partial direct I/O
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 01/11] block: Reorder the queue flag manipulaton function definitions
Next by thread: [PATCH 02/11] block: Use the queue_flag_*() functions instead of open-coding these
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ATA RAID] [IDE] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux