On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 10:14:04AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Omar. > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 02:14:44PM -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote: > > > wake_index = atomic_read(&sbq->wake_index); > > > for (i = 0; i < SBQ_WAIT_QUEUES; i++) { > > > struct sbq_wait_state *ws = &sbq->ws[wake_index]; > > > > So I think we want a patch for the test_and_set_bit_lock() and > > clear_bit_unlock(), but the rest should stay as-is. > > Yeah, that makes sense to me. Would you be interested in updating the > patch? Yup, I'll send it up. Thanks, Tejun!