On Thu, 2018-02-15 at 02:13 +0000, Al Viro wrote: > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 08:37:02PM -0500, John Pittman wrote: > > In quite a few files throughout the block layer, the bare 'unsigned' is > > used rather than the preferred 'unsigned int'. > > Preferred by whom? The kernel as a whole, ~12:1 > > The issue was > > What is that "issue" and why is it a problem in the first place? it's not. > Oh, good - so presumably it does have some explanations beyond "The Most Holy > checkpatch.pl Spake Unto Us"; could the esteemed sir share those with us? infidel... ;)
